since i had to rate a lot of 'em - i changed my prev.
MMXIV-01-14 method - to a faster but not necessarily a better 1 the measurement schematic stays the same only the computations and what's being sampled a bit varies -- an example::
12VAC |
~AC-TEST |
|
12VAC |
–DC-TEST (Full-Cycle
Rectified) |
IL1(mA) |
UL1(V) |
ZL1(Ω) |
UL2(V) |
UL1:UL2 |
|
LABEL |
VALUE(Ω) |
UIN(V) |
EBRIDGE(V) |
rBRIDGE(Ω) |
UIN.std.Z |
16 |
234.2 |
14637.5 |
15.08 |
15.5305 |
|
1K5 |
1597.75 |
20.45 |
20.8 |
27.34535 |
20.55842 |
16.2 |
234.4 |
14469.14 |
15.09 |
15.53347 |
|
K91 |
893.625 |
20.2 |
20.8 |
26.54332 |
20.46157 |
16.5 |
235.2 |
14254.55 |
15.14 |
15.53501 |
|
K75 |
770.875 |
20.15 |
20.8 |
24.86694 |
20.42681 |
17 |
236.5 |
13911.76 |
15.22 |
15.53876 |
|
K51 |
515 |
19.75 |
20.7 |
24.77215 |
20.30202 |
17.6 |
237.7 |
13505.68 |
15.3 |
15.53595 |
|
K47 |
467.25 |
19.75 |
20.7 |
22.47532 |
20.26391 |
17.9 |
238.3 |
13312.85 |
15.33 |
15.54468 |
|
K39 |
395.25 |
19.44 |
20.6 |
23.58488 |
20.18945 |
18 |
238.5 |
13250 |
15.34 |
15.54759 |
|
K33D |
323.5 |
19.26 |
20.58 |
22.17134 |
20.08323 |
18 |
238.5 |
13250 |
15.33 |
15.55773 |
|
K24 |
239.575 |
19.1 |
20.7 |
20.06911 |
19.88138 |
18 |
238.6 |
13255.56 |
15.34 |
15.55411 |
|
K20 |
205.97 |
18.82 |
20.51 |
18.49571 |
19.7565 |
18.1 |
238.8 |
13193.37 |
15.35 |
15.557 |
|
K10 |
101.125 |
17.92 |
20.6 |
15.1236 |
18.87996 |
18.6 |
239.9 |
12897.85 |
15.42 |
15.55772 |
|
K10G |
95.95 |
17.87 |
20.6 |
14.65828 |
18.79162 |
18.8 |
240.2 |
12776.6 |
15.44 |
15.55699 |
|
51EA |
50.75 |
16.66 |
20.67 |
12.21534 |
17.3766 |
19.5 |
241.5 |
12384.62 |
15.52 |
15.56057 |
|
26R |
26.125 |
15.075 |
20.75 |
9.834784 |
15.1013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.75 |
20.75 |
|
|
AVG :: |
237.8692 |
13469.19 |
15.3 |
15.5364 |
|
Geom.Mean
:: |
|
20.68266 |
9.655674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Characteristic String : |
21dW154dV138mA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transformer Name : |
12VAC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Label |
Value |
UL2(V) |
UL1(V) |
IL2(mA) |
IL2.Chk(mA) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1K5 |
1597.75 |
15.71 |
245.2 |
9.832577 |
9.871807 |
|
L1 |
Hz |
50 |
1 |
|
K91 |
893.625 |
15.72 |
245.8 |
17.59127 |
17.66619 |
|
IL1(mA) |
17.81844 |
0.867283 |
|
K75 |
770.875 |
15.62 |
244.1 |
20.26269 |
20.32819 |
|
VL1(V) |
240 |
4.276427 |
|
K51 |
515 |
15.52 |
242.8 |
30.13592 |
30.16871 |
|
Z |
13469.19 |
11.30787 |
|
K47 |
467.25 |
15.67 |
245.6 |
33.53665 |
33.59338 |
|
XL |
13466.43 |
29.87655 |
|
K39 |
395.25 |
15.55 |
243.6 |
39.34219 |
39.27984 |
|
L(H) |
42.86497 |
95.1mH |
|
K33D |
323.5 |
15.68 |
246.2 |
48.46986 |
48.27218 |
|
R1(Ω) |
272.75 |
0.177579 |
|
K24 |
239.575 |
15.73 |
247.8 |
65.65794 |
64.83922 |
|
L2 |
R2(Ω) |
1.2 |
29.90064 |
|
K20 |
205.97 |
15.57 |
245.4 |
75.59353 |
74.0185 |
|
L(mH) |
177.5786 |
55.80086 |
|
K10 |
101.125 |
15.28 |
243.3 |
151.1001 |
135.5857 |
|
VL2(V) |
15.4476 |
|
|
K10G |
95.95 |
15.17 |
241.7 |
158.1032 |
140.1582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
51EA |
50.75 |
14.75 |
239.8 |
290.6404 |
204.6301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26R |
26.125 |
14.28 |
241.7 |
546.6029 |
252.4927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
in short :: the
~AC-TEST -- returns Z
L1(Ω) and Voltage transfer ratio - which are used in computing the L
L2(mH) , U
L2(V)
AND I
L2.Chk(mA) , e.c. ...
the dynamic
~AC-TEST (under the [ Transformer Name : ] ) -- returns from U
L1(V) , U
L2(V) , R
TEST.N(Ω) --
/!\ /!\ something I
L2(mA) which are then checked against the
~AC-TEST based computed I
L2.Chk(mA)
from this it seems that the TF(transformer)'s power transfer is dependent on it's load -- see the R
BRIDGE(Ω) under the
—DC-TEST -- //// -- so you need to adjust the L
L2(mH) to match your circuit's average op.-g conditions (the previous method matched the average test range)
note::the "Characteristic String" is described in
HERE for more detail -- it's more meaningful inside the set of such for multiple TF-s -- has a comparative purpose.
[EOF]
MMXIV-09-08 note :: i in principle won't remove the below Bsh - the Blogger editor is (still - i guess) unpredictable (the 1-st impresion tends to stay - even more if there's no tendency to improvement throughout several . . . years ◄ such fixes a permanent attitude like below - i suggest you don't focus)
sub-note: Kuradi sita virvendus! Mõlemad - Blogger ja FF - nii koos kui eraldi -- üks kukub ära ja teine ei saa hakkama -- eriline utoopia on mingit asja siin üldse aretada kui debiilikud on töövahendeid üritanud teha (hea on kui see asi nüüd nii jääb nagu ta praegu paistab (kuradi idiootide maa - nahhui . . . persse!)) - no offence this is how i see it . . . i always wondered why people remove their blogs - i guess such may be a reason - if you try to do it (blog) too often - it eats the last of your nerves off . . .
Kõik , võimlemistund on tänaseks läbi XD (Vabakava Googli ja Tulirebasega XD XD XD &%!&&/!(&/¤#!%%/%¤ . . . Põrgu´!)