Testing couple of rectifier circuits from datasheets

The following schematics are from LT1122 and LTC1047 d/s-s
while the first performs more than good -- then on a contrary i had to modify the 2-nd

↓Src::LT1122 datasheet -- not tested at various frequencies nor input amplitudes/wave-forms
 

↓Src::LTC1047 datasheet -- the 10kHz seems to be the limit for the outp integrity here

//// recently i noticed something while using a variant of the ideal diode circuit as shown in the "Low Voltage Op-Amps -- in-simulation TEST" -- so i am about to test through all "Absolute circuits" for their particular peculiarities . . .

↓Src::NE5535 datasheet

↓Src::http://nptel.ac.in/courses/117107094/17

↓Src::https://www.planetanalog.com/author.asp?section_id=3065&doc_id=562650 -- the circuit can do just at about 200kHz !? //// note :: i forgot to change the counter-weight 1N4148-s to 1N34-s below (their effect is not studied here , purpose = pending -- what seems obvious is not always that -- it must be verified whether there should be counter-balance for rectifying diodes or not . . .)

↓Src::https://forum.allaboutcircuits.com/threads/a-full-wave-precision-rectifier-query.9821/ --

↓Src::http://sound.whsites.net/appnotes/an001.htm -- it can go up to the limits defined by the frequency & slew of the Op Amp in use ((!? amazing circuit ?!))

↓Src::http://www.learningelectronics.net/worksheets/opamp8.html --the ® had a "bug" so i made random guesses . . . came out as good as previous ((at least what it seems so far ?)) /// edit : the R9 should be Rcp (although there seems no significant current to/from GND from/to U2.non-inverting_input) /// the input signal amplitude range is ±1.8V @ ±5V supply and ±10V @ ±15V supply -- simplified to a line equation y = ax + b where a = 1.219512195 , b = 2.804878049 , y = VsupTOT/2 , x= abs(±VmaxINP) referenced to the GND ( = Vsup "median" )

updates 'll follow ...

---

[Eop]

Op Amp "Internal ground"

the experiment

---

[Eof]

OpAmp (virtual) Testing ②

---

UPDATE :: ... @ https://chpsndtch.blogspot.com/2020/11/revised-my-lm321358324-transitor-models.html

---

Quick eval. ::

LT1012A		It's either really embarrassing  or super funny that all those macro models use the 1 and the very same input stage (see V4 , oo , vG - values) it reminds me the university times where 90% of our course copied their essays from higher courser´s -- guess it's a good custom . . . muhahaa the LT1012 seems to have smth. @ 60kHz ??
LT1122		seems nice ?
LM324.cir
LM324G.asc		. . . it seems that the 2N5087 , 2N5089 are too good to be used here . . . 94.5dB voltage gain @ 1kHz
LM324H.asc		(same as prev.) 79.6dB voltage gain @ 1kHz perhaps describes the LM324 in certain situations ?
LM324J.asc		(same as pre-prev.)

---

[Eop]

OpAmp (virtual) Testing LM324 LT1012 LT1122

it looks like the LT1122 goes better for Amplifier-X testing than my prev. preference '1012
and here if why ::

LT1012	LT1122
no much difference until here "we" had to compensate the .CiR model ('s why i preffer the macro 1-s)	! The LT1122 can still handle the mess ? (supposedly thanks to "fast output settling"? and/or 14x higher band with)

many attempts to reduce output offset (to Zero adj. the Amp.) - or - what was tested ::

the 1-st modification - G ( IS = 3.66mA )	the 2-nd modification - H ( IS= 813µA )
the 3-rd modification - J ( IS = 3.66mA )	onsemi source ( IS = 1.2(3) mA : VS = ±2.5(±15) V : RL = ∞ )

---

update 2017-09-19
verifying LM324 CLM-s´ variants ....

.... so the operation of G and J ver.-s is somewhat predictable.

---

[Eop]