Showing posts with label mc33071. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mc33071. Show all posts
Monday, May 21, 2018
Friday, December 22, 2017
Comparing Constant Current Circuits (to sort/verify the LED-s with)
▼Fast/Simple/Robust/Trivial Op-Amp + BJT Setup▼
→ apx. 16mA ±30µA(0.2%)
→ apx. 18mA ±24µA(0.1%)
→ apx. 18mA ±60nA(0.0003%)
→ apx. 18mA ±300nA(0.002%)
(likely worse than it's BJT alternate -- the 2-nd ↑↑ fig. )
→ apx. 18mA ±120µA(0.7%)
-- it seems that the op-amps should be fed from the separate supplies or otherwise the PSRR won't recover the precision reached at reference voltages
→ apx. 18mA ±48µA(0.3%)
((the work is in progress ...))
▼If you are stupid then knowing the right Op-Amp-s could save your day▼
(the node "SE" had the greatest error although the node "a0" has the least ??? -- about LT1012A)
→ apx. 18mA ±10µA(0.06%)
-------- Update 2017.12.24 ::
▼a conditional opposite to "If you are stupid then knowing the right Op-Amp-s could save your day"▼
→ apx. 18mA ±7µA(0.04%)
[Eop]
→ apx. 16mA ±30µA(0.2%)
[fig.1]
▼Complex/Trivial Op-Amp + BJT Setup▼→ apx. 18mA ±24µA(0.1%)
[fig.2]
▼Simple/Experimental BJT Setup ( !? the Best ?! )▼→ apx. 18mA ±60nA(0.0003%)
[fig.3]
▼Full/Trivial BJT + N-jFet Setup ( also better than any op-amp variant ??? )▼→ apx. 18mA ±300nA(0.002%)
[fig.4]
▼Complex/Experimental Op-Amp + MOS-Fet Setup▼(likely worse than it's BJT alternate -- the 2-nd ↑↑ fig. )
→ apx. 18mA ±120µA(0.7%)
[fig.5]
▼Trying to get it right here▼-- it seems that the op-amps should be fed from the separate supplies or otherwise the PSRR won't recover the precision reached at reference voltages
→ apx. 18mA ±48µA(0.3%)
[fig.6]
((the work is in progress ...))
▼If you are stupid then knowing the right Op-Amp-s could save your day▼
(the node "SE" had the greatest error although the node "a0" has the least ??? -- about LT1012A)
→ apx. 18mA ±10µA(0.06%)
[fig.7]
-------- Update 2017.12.24 ::
▼a conditional opposite to "If you are stupid then knowing the right Op-Amp-s could save your day"▼
→ apx. 18mA ±7µA(0.04%)
[fig.8.1]
a "Russian LM308" **
[fig.8.2]
** it's nearest LT's substitute (so far)
[Eop]
Labels:
Bjt,
constant current,
j-Fet,
LED,
LED driver,
LM324,
LT1012,
LT1366,
mc33071,
MOSFET,
OpAmp,
к140уд1408
Saturday, December 16, 2017
Random Op-Amp TEST - 2
Heuristic Test /// note that no matter these results may seem poor , they are poor in conjunction to the (perhaps a poor) test setup and relative to each other - - - i never test poor amplifiers (e.g. something that i know will fail my application) or do not test such without especially denoting it . . . as in fact the TLV314 was the best performer of a previous tests of it's kind (Low-power , Low-Voltage CMOS Op Amps) - - - here we have a high slew rate and/or high slew rate to bandwidth ratio Op Amps tested (where the TLV314 is just for comparison)
Fuzzily about how it works
[Eop]
Fuzzily about how it works
[Eop]












