Showing posts with label spice simulation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label spice simulation. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 29, 2020

More experimental spice models


Digital (SN7400 , SN7404 , SN7414 , SN7474 , SN7486 , SN74112)

how and when i use ↑these↑ :: is to determine the apx. dynamic power draw , relative I/O states , etc.

it is not advised to use these in complex digital simulations coz such takes excessive time ... and serves no conceptual purpose


TLC555 (Ti's P-Spice , + a Less simplified , + a More simplified)

since my first Ti's TLC variant model conversion for the LTSpice got destroyed  in OS reinstall - i haven't had time to recreate it . . . so -- the simplified /!\ ideal /!\ models are "close enough" to run a principial simulations -- one must address the shortcomings of such . . . + moreover the ideal models lack some required damping and referencing internal components ← means: the simulation may hang due the shortcomings from such = all pins must be connected or referenced through R or R C networks ← the values of which may be crucial to simulation "stability" (not to hang , etc. ...)


"DIGITAL" PASS GATE (not fully verified but so far a will do v. -- with 2 simulation examples)
(related post : Comparing TTL JK Triggers' Logic Designs)

example use



[Eop]

Wednesday, May 11, 2016

CD4003 (К176ТМ1)

e.g. what to do with old stuff ...


Simplified CMOS setup - to gain reasonable simulation speeds ...

one half of the chip (the 4011 and -69 have the same I/O/supply scheme) :



extendable counter setup :



[Eop]

Monday, April 18, 2016

occasional RF Amp test

... converting the X-tal oscillator to RF 1


capabilities test with my "phase shift std." phase shifter


 ◄ works quite occasionally e.g. returns ~Max. performance although using a different amp. may reach or exceed the unity gain fq. . . . (funny i guess i already uploaded ↓that↓ stuff - must´ve been in prev v. of this blog , ?hmm) anyway here´s how to exceed the transistors unity gain ::


(spice magic)


[Eop]

Monday, March 21, 2016

supply test defaults update

±1µV precision @ 1Hz ::




PS! this simulation uses 2N3906 for switch transistor
for 300mA continuous drainthere should be
6x 2N3906 in parallel or higher I.continuos switch

Switching v. ::


PS! this circuit is too complex to succeed @ 1-st build
- "we" feature here a quick poor setup example
for testing the grid at higher varying rate loads . . .

[Eop]

Monday, February 15, 2016

((Circus))

This ?? textbook fig. appears to be too common

and misleading

while it's likely used as below


there's no need for comparator per bit if it's (+) INP is connected to somewhere below 1.4V in this example ((this is how you tune such a sh¡t with spice . . . all fun!)) -- shortly put you write your bit by setting global S and Z(S̅) while C (EW) E (ER) W (R/W̅) are on their respective LOW level , then enable write by pulling C (of a specific memory cell) to it's HIGH level and after setting time back to LOW -- you read a bit by enabling read (disabling input) by pulling global W HIGH cell specific E HIGH (which requires a 3-rd transistors to be added to both shoulders of this RAM cell (see fig. below) and enabling a level drop dn ((by pulling (((this rebuilt))) E HIGH)) to a global OUTPUT BUS) that sets the MR which in turn is fixed at output register as D0 (for example)



Yes thank you Google's Einsteins for removing my unicode overlines , thank you ((mõned inimesed on ikka sündind idioodid))

 since using PNP read-gate it seems the 3-rd transistors're not required

the plot is basically same than above
-- A , B for monitoring mem-cell's state
-- S , Z set global data
-- SB , ZB , W are respectively D , NOT D , NOT write (they can be global and then we still need a 3-rd tansistors for data read)
-- SB , ZB , E are respectively D , NOT D , NOT read (mem-cell specific)
-- SR , ZR , MR are respectively D , NOT D , D read (all global ((to max number of bits that can be reliably set and read also limited by power consumption (((e.g. the memory block can be suspended to low-power mode - still preserving it's data - while no read write to that area occurs))) )) )


re: about Google's Einsteins -- it appears that when pasting unicode overline to Blogger Editor it shows there - but when you save/publish and then reopen for modification - the unicode overlines won't display in Compose nor HTML view (however they're preserved and after re-save they'll show up in www blog) -- so now i have unicode overlines and CSS ones -- thanks for Google's Einsteins -- who newer take their job seriously (or perhaps someones pet pig programmed the Blogger Editor -- in which case it's to be considered as an achievement !!!)


back to 3+3 transistor (separate RW) RAM


The interesting part of this circus is thus over. It seems the W pin has no much effect (at least with this 2-bit v.) -- it might be reducing errors near max fq. op. . . . perhaps. So the conceptual part is over - the rest is fine tuning and right component + layout selection/dev. . This one is over 1000x slower and inefficient than the commercial FET memories -- the background of this circus is that at the time i attempted to make it run all under 1.2V and it didn't quite work out -- so now "we" used some more realistic voltage levels . . . (end, over & out ×·

[Eop]

Saturday, September 20, 2014

about LM113 Simulation

i donno - either i'm stupid , use wrong transistors or what's worse - this thing actually does not work in real ::


this is what GOOGLE thinks you should be happy with . . .

® TIF
- opens fast & displays with Adobe Photoshop Elements , opens slow & displays with Nero PhotoSnap Viewer , opens but does not display with Microsoft Office Document Imaging (is a zip compressed while the less opt.-d 260KB LZW copy does!)
about :: FUCK - i uploaded an optimized 600dpi B&W 135KB (138 268 byte) TIFF image - now what GOOGLE doeas is "fuck your quality" - IT'S NOW NEARLY UNREADABLE JPG - thank you - thank you - thank you - thank you - thank you - thank you - thank you - thank you - thank you - thank you - thank you - thank you ... 

... why to write a web page is ► no one reads it anyway - ◄ such a predictive img formatting policy F;i ? why not XD (! IDIOTS)

... I GUESS I GONNA CANCEL THAT BLOG - along shot with the GOOGLE translations of my stuff ◄ this really sucks
. . . as i did proceed - v.1 ::


 a "fuzzy logic" induced "meet power" - spike reduction attempt (i din't want to discard/modify any of Ti components - assuming the schematic being authentic)

-------------------- - v.2 ::


??? both v.-s' simulations show a "strong" hysteresis - for near static mode such does not matter - as does not and the initial ON-spike

.

.

.

.

[EOF]